nullifies any arguments saying Villanova wasn’t healthy

Host, Hobbie, Gert, Gandalf en co's persoonlijke erger-hoekje

nullifies any arguments saying Villanova wasn’t healthy

Postby elvafeng » Wed Mar 14, 2018 3:40 am

he Blue Devils still have work to do next week in Brooklyn, but for the time being, they should be considered a 1 seed.

Duke has won 6 of 7 and has not allowed more than 70 points in those seven games.

While I was thinking about this article I was going to make the case that Duke should be a 1 ahead of Kansas.

Since Kanas clinched their 14th straight regular season Big 12 title and won 8 Texas Tech doing so, I believe they deserved a 1 seed until they got run off the court yesterday by Oklahoma State by 18 points.

Villanova lost to Creighton last week and there is another team that Duke should be a 1 seed over.

However, in my opinion, whoever wins the Big East Tournament, Villanova or Xavier will be a 1 seed.

Villanova lost 3 of their final 8 games, all 3 losses were to unranked teams.

Over that eight game stretch for Villanova, Duke played and won all of their the first four games without the ACC Player of the Year, Marvin Bagley III.

This nullifies any arguments saying Villanova wasn’t healthy and how they weren’t at full strength.

The one player Villanova did have during this stretch, Jalen Brunson Kyle Wiltjer Jersey, maybe the National Player of the Year.

Duke gave up an average of 57.8 points per game during the last 7 games of the season.

If Duke goes to Brooklyn and possibly defeats a fully healthy Notre Dame, North Carolina, and Virginia, there is no conversation, Duke will be a 1 seed.
forum schacht
forum schacht
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2018 3:33 am

Return to Opmerkingen i.v.m. website en forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests